This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.
sets out the exclusionary rule for coincidence evidence. The rule ("the coincidence rule") prevents the admission of evidence of the occurrence of two or more events that is being tendered to prove that, because of the improbability of the events occurring coincidentally, a person did a particular act or had a particular state of mind. The clause applies where the party adducing the evidence of the two or more events relies on any similarities in the events or any similarities in the circumstances in which the events occurred. The clause also applies where the evidence of the two or more events relies on any similarities in both the events and circumstances in which the events occurred. There is an exception to the coincidence rule. Coincidence evidence can be admitted under this clause if appropriate notice is given and the court finds that the evidence of the two or more events has significant probative value. The assessment of probative value can take into account other evidence, not just the coincidence evidence alone. This clause incorporates recommendation 11-1 of the 2005 LRCs' Report and omits the requirement (contained in section 98 of the UEAs) that the events be substantially similar with the surrounding circumstances. See clause 97 above for a discussion of significant probative value. See clause 101 below for an additional consideration regarding admissibility of coincidence evidence in relation to criminal proceedings. The Note to subclause (1) clarifies the intention and effect of the provision by stating that the two or more related events, which constitute the coincidence evidence, may include an event which is a fact in issue in the proceeding. This note implements recommendation 11-2 of the 2005 LRCs' Report. The exclusionary coincidence rule does not apply to coincidence evidence adduced to explain or contradict coincidence evidence adduced by another party. Such evidence is not excluded under this clause.