This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.
provides that in specific circumstances the credibility rule does not apply to rebutting a witness's denials by other evidence. Subclause (1)(a) sets out the specific circumstances—when in cross-examination of the witness, the substance of the evidence is put to the witness and it is denied, or the witness did not admit or agree to it. If the court then gives leave, credibility evidence can be adduced. The inclusion of the circumstance "the witness . . . did not agree to it" is in response to the 2005 LRCs' Report (recommendation 12-5). It found that a sole requirement that the substance of the evidence be denied and that the evidence be relevant to a defined category may prevent the admission of important evidence for reasons of efficiency rather than fairness. Clause 106 creates a broader basis on which to admit evidence. Subclause (2) provides that leave is not required where the evidence falls within paragraphs (a) to (e). These circumstances include where the witness is biased, has made a prior inconsistent statement or where the witness is, or was, unable to be aware of matters to which their evidence relates.