This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.
Act index » Chapter 8 - General » Part 8.2 - Witnesses » Division 3 - Cross-examination of protected witnesses
357 When accused is not legally represented
How this provision has changed across versions can't be shown yet: the versions of this Act held here were read by different versions of the parser, and comparing them would report the parsers' own disagreements as amendments. Re-parse every version to restore it.
(1)If the accused is not legally represented, the court must—
(a)inform the accused and the jury (if any) that the accused is not permitted personally to cross-examine a protected witness; and
(b)ask the accused whether the accused has sought legal representation for the cross-examination of a protected witness; and
(c)if satisfied that the accused has not had a reasonable opportunity to obtain legal representation, grant an adjournment if so requested by the accused.
(2)If the accused does not obtain legal representation for the cross-examination of a protected witness (after being given a reasonable opportunity to do so), the court must order Victoria Legal Aid to provide legal representation for the accused for that purpose.
(3)Despite anything in the Legal Aid Act 1978, Victoria Legal Aid must provide legal representation in accordance with an order under subsection (2).
(4)A legal practitioner provided by Victoria Legal Aid must act in the best interests of the accused if the accused does not give any instructions to that legal practitioner.
(5)Subject to any direction given under section 389E(2)(f), if the accused refuses the legal representation provided under subsection (3), or otherwise refuses to co-operate, the court must warn the accused that the accused will not be permitted to adduce evidence in relation to a fact in issue in order to contradict the evidence of a protected witness unless the evidence on which the accused intends to rely has been put to the protected witness during cross-examination.