Text as at 1 July 2026
This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.

229 Procedure for joint trials if no-case submission made

How this provision has changed across versions can't be shown yet: the versions of this Act held here were read by different versions of the parser, and comparing them would report the parsers' own disagreements as amendments. Re-parse every version to restore it.
(1)This section applies to a trial in which 2 or more accused are named on the indictment.
(2)After the close of the case for the prosecution, an accused who wishes to make a submission that there is no case for the accused to answer must do so at that time.
(3)If, after the trial judge has ruled on all no-case submissions, 2 or more accused remain on trial, the accused named first on the indictment must advise the trial judge, in response to questioning under section 227 or 228, which of the options referred to in section 226(b) or (c) the accused elects to take.
S. 229(3) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 49(k).
(4)Each accused named subsequently on the indictment is not required to advise the trial judge of the election of that accused until the close of the case for the previously named accused.
(5)The cases of all accused must proceed according to the order in which the accused are named on the indictment, unless the trial judge otherwise orders.