Text as at 1 July 2026
This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.

228 Election when accused is not legally represented

How this provision has changed across versions can't be shown yet: the versions of this Act held here were read by different versions of the parser, and comparing them would report the parsers' own disagreements as amendments. Re-parse every version to restore it.
Explained inBill clause 228
(1)If an accused is not represented by a legal practitioner, immediately after the close of the case for the prosecution and in the absence of the jury, the trial judge must inform the accused, in a manner that is likely to be understood by the accused, that—
(a)the accused has the right to answer the charge and must choose either—
(i)to give sworn or affirmed evidence, that is, to enter the witness box, take the oath or make an affirmation and say what the accused wants to say in answer to the charge and then to respond to any questions from the prosecution or the court about the evidence of the accused; or
S. 228(1)(a)(i) amended by No. 6/2018 s. 68(Sch. 2 item 38.1).
(ii)to say nothing in answer to the charge; and
(b)in either case, the accused may call any witnesses to give evidence at the trial.
(2)After giving the information referred to in subsection (1), the trial judge must ask the accused what the accused wants to do.