This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.
Contents » Chapter 3 - ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE Introductory Note » Division 1 - The hearsay rule
Clause 60 Exception—evidence relevant for a non-hearsay purpose
(1)The hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation that is admitted because it is relevant for a purpose other than proof of an asserted fact.
(2)This section applies whether or not the person who made the representation had personal knowledge of the asserted fact (within the meaning of section 62(2)).
Subsection (2) was inserted as a response to the decision of the High Court of Australia in Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594.
(3)However, this section does not apply in a criminal proceeding to evidence of an admission.
The admission might still be admissible under section 81 as an exception to the hearsay rule if it is "first-hand" hearsay—see section 82.