Text as at 25 March 2024
This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.

65 Exception—criminal proceedings if maker not available

(1)This section applies in a criminal proceeding if a person who made a previous representation is not available to give evidence about an asserted fact.
(2)The hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation that is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the representation being made, if the representation—
(a)was made under a duty to make that representation or to make representations of that kind; or
S. 65(8)(a) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 55.14).
(b)was made when or shortly after the asserted fact occurred and in circumstances that make it unlikely that the representation is a fabrication; or
S. 65(8)(b) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 55.14).
(c)was made in circumstances that make it highly probable that the representation is reliable; or
(d)was—
(i)against the interests of the person who made it at the time it was made; and
(ii)made in circumstances that make it likely that the representation is reliable.
Section 67 imposes notice requirements relating to this subsection.
(3)The hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation made in the course of giving evidence in an Australian or overseas proceeding if, in that proceeding, the accused in the proceeding to which this section is being applied—
S. 65(3) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 55.11).
(a)cross-examined the person who made the representation about it; or
(b)had a reasonable opportunity to cross- examine the person who made the representation about it.
Section 67 imposes notice requirements relating to this subsection.
(4)If there is more than one accused in the criminal proceeding, evidence of a previous representation that— cannot be used against an accused who did not cross-examine, and did not have a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine, the person about the representation.
S. 65(4) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 55.12).
(a)is given in an Australian or overseas proceeding; and
(b)is admitted into evidence in the criminal proceeding because of subsection (3)—
(5)For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4), an accused is taken to have had a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine a person if the accused was not present at a time when the cross- examination of a person might have been conducted but—
S. 65(5) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 55.13).
(a)could reasonably have been present at that time; and
(b)if present could have cross-examined the person.
(6)Evidence of the making of a representation to which subsection (3) applies may be adduced by producing a transcript, or a recording, of the representation that is authenticated by—
(a)the person to whom, or the court or other body to which, the representation was made; or
(b)if applicable, the registrar or other proper officer of the court or other body to which the representation was made; or
(c)the person or body responsible for producing the transcript or recording.
(7)Without limiting subsection (2)(d), a representation is taken for the purposes of that subsection to be against the interests of the person who made it if it tends—
(a)to damage the person's reputation; or
(b)to show that the person has committed an offence for which the person has not been convicted; or
(c)to show that the person is liable in an action for damages.
(8)The hearsay rule does not apply to—
(a)evidence of a previous representation adduced by an accused if the evidence is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the representation being made; or
(b)a document tendered as evidence by an accused so far as it contains a previous representation, or another representation to which it is reasonably necessary to refer in order to understand the representation.
Section 67 imposes notice requirements relating to this subsection.
(9)If evidence of a previous representation about a matter has been adduced by an accused and has been admitted, the hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of another representation about the matter that—
S. 65(9) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 55.15).
(a)is adduced by another party; and
(b)is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the other representation being made.
Clause 4 of Part 2 of the Dictionary is about the availability of persons.