This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.

Clause 83 Admissibility of evidence in absence of accused where full brief served

(1)If— the following are, subject to subsections (2) and

(a)under section 80 the Magistrates' Court proceeds to hear and determine a charge in the absence of the accused; and

(b)the informant has served a full brief on the accused in accordance with Division 2 of Part 3.2—

(3), admissible as if their contents were a record of evidence given orally—

(c)any statement a copy of which has been served in the full brief;

(d)any exhibit or document referred to in a statement which is admissible.

(2)The Magistrates' Court may rule as inadmissible the whole or any part of a statement or of any exhibit or document referred to in a statement.

(3)The criminal record of the accused or a statement that the accused has no previous convictions, when served in a full brief, is only admissible for the purpose of sentencing in accordance with section 86.

(4)Subsection (1) does not limit the power of the Magistrates' Court to proceed to hear and determine the charge in the absence of the accused under section 80 on the basis of sworn evidence given by or on behalf of the informant if the informant has not served a full brief on the accused.