This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.
Act index » Chapter 8 - General » Part 8.2 - Witnesses » Division 2 - Evidence concerning complainant
349 Determination of application for leave during summary hearing or trial
How this provision has changed across versions can't be shown yet: the versions of this Act held here were read by different versions of the parser, and comparing them would report the parsers' own disagreements as amendments. Re-parse every version to restore it.
In the course of a summary hearing or trial, the court must not grant leave under section 342 unless it is satisfied that the evidence has substantial relevance to a fact in issue and that it is in the interests of justice to allow the cross-examination or to admit the evidence, having regard to—
S. 349 (Heading) amended by No. 5/2025 s. 19(1).New s. 349 inserted by No. 68/2009 s. 50, amended by No. 5/2025 s. 19(2).S. 349 renumbered as s. 401 by No. 68/2009 s. 52(n).
(a)whether the probative value of the evidence outweighs the distress, humiliation and embarrassment that the complainant may experience as a result of the cross-examination or the admission of the evidence, in view of the age of the complainant and the number and nature of the questions that the complainant is likely to be asked; and
(b)the risk that the evidence may arouse in the jury discriminatory belief or bias, prejudice, sympathy or hostility; and
(c)the need to respect the complainant's personal dignity and privacy; and
(d)the right of the accused to fully answer and defend the charge.