This provision has not been checked by a human. The text below was read automatically from the official PDF and has not yet been verified against it, so it may differ from the provision as published — in its wording, its numbering, or where one provision ends and the next begins. For the authorised text, see legislation.vic.gov.au.
Act index » Chapter 7A - Limitations on rules relating to double jeopardy
327O Orders on determination of application
How this provision has changed across versions can't be shown yet: the versions of this Act held here were read by different versions of the parser, and comparing them would report the parsers' own disagreements as amendments. Re-parse every version to restore it.
(1)On an application under section 327H, if the Court of Appeal is satisfied of the matters in section 327L or 327M, the court may order that—
(a)the previous acquittal of the accused of an offence charged in the direct indictment be set aside or removed as a bar to the accused being tried on the direct indictment (as the case requires); and
(b)the prosecution of the charge in the direct indictment may continue.
(2)On an application under section 327H, if the Court of Appeal is satisfied of the matters in section 327N, the court may order that—
(b)the prosecution of the charge in the direct indictment may continue.
(3)In addition to subsections (1) and (2), the Court of Appeal may make any other order that it considers appropriate.
(4)If the Court of Appeal is not satisfied that section 327L, 327M or 327N applies or that a fair trial is likely, the court must order that the charge in the direct indictment is permanently stayed.
(5)If more than one offence is charged in the direct indictment, the Court of Appeal must make an order under subsection (1), (2) or (4) in relation to each charge.
(6)If the Court of Appeal makes an order under subsection (1) or (2), the court may make any order for or in relation to the bail of the accused that the court considers appropriate.